Strategy Comparison Tool

Compare the performance, expense ratios, and growth trajectories of all five investment strategies.

Interactive Strategy Comparison

Select Strategies to Compare

StrategyAnnual ReturnExpense RatioFinal ValueTotal GrowthAnnual Cost
High Growth Technology Focus13.32%0.16%$121,935.821,119.36%$16
Balanced Growth Portfolio11.44%0.1558%$87,261.38772.61%$15.58
Sector Rotation Growth11.04%0.1%$81,206.18712.06%$10
Multi-Cap Growth11.43%0.1995%$87,104.9771.05%$19.95
Global Technology Leaders12.03%0.1562%$96,981.01869.81%$15.62

Annual Return Comparison

Weighted average annual returns for each strategy over 20 years

Expense Ratio Comparison

Weighted average expense ratios for each strategy

Growth Comparison (2005-2025)

Growth of $10,000 invested from 2005 to 2025

Strategy Comparison Table

StrategyAnnual ReturnExpense RatioETFsFinal ValueAction
High Growth Technology Focus13.32%0.16%2$121,935.82View Details
Balanced Growth Portfolio11.44%0.1558%3$87,261.38View Details
Sector Rotation Growth11.04%0.1%4$81,206.18View Details
Multi-Cap Growth11.43%0.1995%4$87,104.9View Details
Global Technology Leaders12.03%0.1562%5$96,981.01View Details

Key Findings

  • Technology Sector Dominance: ETFs with significant technology exposure, such as QQQ and XLK, have been the strongest performers over the 20-year period.
  • Diversification Benefits: While technology-focused strategies showed the highest returns, diversified strategies provided more stable growth with reduced volatility.
  • Expense Ratio Impact: Lower expense ratios contributed to better long-term performance, highlighting the importance of cost-efficient ETF selection.
  • Growth vs. Value: Growth-oriented ETFs consistently outperformed value-oriented ETFs over the analysis period.
  • Market Cap Considerations: Large-cap ETFs generally provided more consistent returns, while small and mid-cap ETFs offered higher growth potential with increased volatility.